Plaintiff Allowed to Present Evidence in 2nd IVC Filter Case
Plaintiff Allowed to Present Evidence in 2nd IVC Filter Case
Introduction
The U.S. Federal Judge David G. Campbell, overseeing thousands of IVC Filter lawsuits centralized in the United States District Court District of Arizona, released a Case Management Order on April 18, allowing the plaintiff to present evidence of complications, testing, and design of the Recovery filter stating it would not result in a waste of time or confusion except. At the same time, evidence that highlighted the deaths caused by cephalad migration of the Recovery filter was not allowed to be part of the supporting evidence.
This is the second Bard IVC filter lawsuit scheduled for a May 15, 2018, trial, filed by a plaintiff from Georgia, who was implanted with C.R. Bard’s Eclipse blood clot filter in 2010 to treat her recurrent deep vein thrombosis condition. A pretrial conference is scheduled for May 4 and the expected trial run is 3 weeks.
Comments
Latest News
Talcum Powder Cancer Settlement Talks Begin Sept. 4
Categories: Talcum
Representatives of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and attorneys for tens of thousands of plaintiffs involved in talcum powder lawsuits are scheduled to meet in September 2025 in an…
Tepezza Hearing Loss Trials Delayed Until Aug 2026
Categories: Tepezza
A series of Tepezza hearing loss lawsuits, which were expected to go before juries next year, will now be delayed. The U.S. District Judge overseeing the multidistrict…
Cencora Directors Settle Opioid Oversight Case for $111M
Categories: Opioids
Cencora has agreed to pay $111.3 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit accusing the company’s directors of failing to prevent the unlawful distribution of opioids…