Skip to main content

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Plaintiff In First Zantac Lawsuit To Withdraw The Case

Introduction

According to the plaintiff's lawyer and the drugmakers identified as defendants in the first lawsuit involving the heartburn medication Zantac that is set to go to trial, the plaintiff has decided to withdraw the case.

The decision comes days after investors worry about hundreds of lawsuits alleging the medicine, which U.S. authorities took from the market in 2020, caused cancer, and hurt shares of GlaxoSmithKline Plc, Sanofi SA, Pfizer Inc, and Haleon Plc.

In Illinois state court, the first trial in one of those cases was slated to start the following Monday. The complainant claimed that using over-the-counter Zantac caused him to acquire esophageal cancer.

An attorney representing Bayer stated that although her client was unable to continue due to personal health concerns, he was still entitled to resubmit his case within a year.

Both defendants in the lawsuit, GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim, expressed satisfaction that it had been dismissed and that Zantac was safe based on the available scientific data.

Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi have all offered Zantac at various periods since it was first promoted by a competitor of GSK. Haleon includes consumer health assets that were once owned by GSK and Pfizer and were spun off as an independent business last month.

The 2020 recall came after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration looked into whether the primary ingredient in Zantac, ranitidine, raises blood levels of the potentially cancer-causing substance N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) among users.

A hearing about the admissibility of expert testimony in future trials is planned for September 20 in federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida, where around 2,000 claims have been consolidated.

The first federal court proceedings are scheduled to begin sometime in next year, although the case may be effectively resolved earlier if the corporations receive a relatively favorable verdict on the evidence.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Walgreens Settles Federal Opioid Case for $300 Million

Categories: Opioids

Walgreens has agreed to pay $300 million to settle allegations by U.S. prosecutors that it unlawfully filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced on Monday…

Study: Opioid Use in Pregnancy May Shrink Newborn Brains

Categories: Opioids

New research from Children’s National Hospital in Washington, D.C., reveals that infants exposed to opioids in the womb have significantly smaller brain volumes than…

Suboxone Tooth Loss Lawsuits Reviewed at MDL Meeting

Categories: Opioids

The U.S. District Judge overseeing the federal Suboxone tooth decay multidistrict litigation (MDL) is scheduled to meet with attorneys tomorrow to assess the progress of pretrial proceedings and strategize on resolving over 11,000 product…

🛠️ You Have Unfinished Work. We’ll Finish It — Free Trial.            
Free Trial + 25% Off All DLs & Med Review Case Backlog!

Only 12 Firms Can Join – First Come, First Served