Skip to main content

Federal Government Seeks To Dismiss A $17.5M Med-Mal Suit

Federal Government Seeks To Dismiss A $17.5M Med-Mal Suit

Federal Government Seeks To Dismiss A $17.5M Med-Mal Suit

Introduction

A $17.5 million medical malpractice lawsuit filed by a veteran is being considered to be dismissed. The federal government is seeking the dismissal on the grounds that the complaint was filed a year too late.

According to the lawsuit, the veteran first went to the White River Junction VA Medical Center in 2013 after having intestinal issues. Doctors informed him that he had irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) without any tests. The pain did not reduce till 2016, and he again went to the facility, where he was given the same diagnosis. In February 2017, he suffered rectal bleeding, following which he was taken to the emergency room (ER) of the VA Medical Center and was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer.

The veteran was referred to a physician with the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who in a letter dated June 2018, noted that the IBS symptoms were early signs of cancer that the plaintiff developed due to exposure to burn pits while on tours with the National Guard. A lawsuit was filed against the VA, claiming negligence in improperly diagnosing the disease, which delayed appropriate treatment and left cancer to become terminal.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Julia Tori, representing the VA, argued in her July motion that the lawsuit was filed too late as per the Federal Tort Claims Act, which states that a claim should be filed within two years of the injury. In the motion, she wrote that the plaintiff should have filed the lawsuit within two years of getting the colonoscopy at the ER.

The veteran's attorney in response to the motion, argued that the plaintiff got to know that the IBS diagnosis was incorrect in June 2018, after receiving the letter from the physician, until which he was in the assumption that he had both IBS and colon cancer.

The final date to hear the motion and objection has not been scheduled.

Medical malpractice lawsuits are on the rise throughout the United States in recent years. A Baltimore city jury reversed a $5.8M verdict against the University of Maryland Medical System ("UMMS") on January 14, 2020. The settlement amount was awarded to the family of the woman who died post the heart valve replacement surgery due to cardiac arrest.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Attorneys Seek Reconsideration of Talc MDL Daubert Ruling

Categories: General

Plaintiffs’ attorneys are urging the U.S. District Judge overseeing the talcum powder lawsuit MDL to reconsider a recent decision for a second round…

Philips resolves DreamStation suits for $1.1B

Categories: Settlements

Dutch medical technology company Philips has finalized a $1.1 billion settlement in the United States to address lawsuits concerning faulty…

FDA OKs Generic OTC Naloxone Spray Approved by FDA

Categories: FDA Related

The FDA has granted approval for Amneal Pharmaceuticals to release a generic 4 mg naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray for over-the-counter (OTC) use, an announcement made in a press release.

Our Legal Drafting Services    
start @ $25 per hour.